Différences

Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.

--- tech:privacy_and_security_online [2024/10/05] – [TOR network] Mathieu
+++ tech:privacy_and_security_online [2024/10/05] (Version actuelle) – [Backing Up and Managing Personal Data] Mathieu
@@ Ligne 128: / Ligne 128: @@
 If you're looking for an easy replacement for Chrome, Edge, or Safari without worrying about configuration, it's probably the best solution.
-However, there are reasons you might not want to choose Brave, starting with its integration of a cryptocurrency system((which can easily be disabled)). Some users prefer to avoid Chromium-based solutions, so as not to contribute to the near-monopoly of WebKit((the underlying web rendering engine)) on the web, much like the days of Internet Explorer.
+However, there are reasons you might not want to choose Brave, starting with its integration of a cryptocurrency system((which can easily be disabled)). Some users prefer to avoid Chromium-based solutions, so as not to contribute to the near-monopoly of Blink((the underlying web rendering engine)) on the web, much like the days of Internet Explorer.
 ===== Firefox =====
@@ Ligne 277: / Ligne 277: @@
   * Making backups on **physical media**, such as external hard drives or USB keys. This is a viable approach, but it becomes quite complex when considering the need for regular backups, stored off-site to protect against risks like theft or fire. **This approach requires a lot of discipline and regular rotation of media**, making it a fragile and difficult strategy to implement.
-  * Using an online service, such as those mentioned above, but **encrypting your data** before uploading it to the service. This is a perfectly viable approach, though somewhat complex. You won’t be able to rely on the built-in sync features of mainstream services, and you’ll lose access to features that require unencrypted files (such as sharing or online editing). If you choose this route, it's better to use a "bucket" service like AWS, which will cost less and be better suited for this use case. I personally use [[https://www.backblaze.com/b2/cloud-storage.html|Backblaze B2]], {{:tech:nextcloud_logo.svg.png?nolink&200|}}.
+  * Using an online service, such as those mentioned above, but **encrypting your data** before uploading it to the service. This is a perfectly viable approach, though somewhat complex. You won’t be able to rely on the built-in sync features of mainstream services, and you’ll lose access to features that require unencrypted files (such as sharing or online editing). If you choose this route, it's better to use a "bucket" service like AWS, which will cost less and be better suited for this use case. I personally use [[https://www.backblaze.com/b2/cloud-storage.html|Backblaze B2]],
+{{ :tech:nextcloud_logo.svg.png?nolink&200 |}}.
   * <wrap danger>zone 3</wrap> Self-hosting your own data storage, synchronization, sharing, and editing service, using a tool like [[https://nextcloud.com|NextCloud]]. This solution is by far the most complex, but it's also the one that gives you the best of both worlds: complete control over your data security, along with sharing and editing features. However, this route is **far more technically demanding** than the previous two.